The questions to be asked prior to applying succession law.
Certain questions will arise concurrently with the application of the law of the succession. Such is the case of the questions referred to in Article 1(2) f,g,h,i,j,k.[1]
The formal validity of dispositions of property upon death made orally is excluded from the Regulation[1].
Gifts made inter vivos are excluded from the Regulation.
The list proposed in this article is not exhaustive. It includes gifts, accretion clauses, pension plans and insurance policies. This exclusion is only partial, since the effectiveness of these parallel gifts is subject to the law on succession[2].
Questions pertaining to company law are excluded from the Regulation.
When a partner dies, the transmission of his shares is subject to the law determined by the rules of conflict applicable in matters of company law.
Trusts are also excluded from the scope of application of the Regulation. Once again, this exclusion is only partial, as it concerns the creation, administration and dissolution of the trust. Therefore, if the trust creates a gift, the law applicable to the succession will limit its effectiveness.
Example :
If we imagine a trust established pursuant to English law, if the law applicable to the succession is French law, the trust may end up being subject to the latter’s provisions on restoring or accounting for gifts.
The nature of rights in rem. In this matter, the law of the succession will be set aside in favour of the law of the location of the assets. The idea behind this exclusion is that a right in rem that is unknown in the location of the assets cannot be imposed. It should be noted, however, that Article 31 of the Regulation[3] invites us, to the extent possible, to adapt the unknown right in rem by seeking to identify the closest equivalent right in rem in the location of the asset.