Choice of law
Which law?
Article 24(2)[1] therefore extends the provisions of 'Article 22[2] to the will. In other words, the testator may have his law governed either by his national law on the day of the will of by his national law on the day of death.
Note :
It should be pointed out immediately that the transposition of Article 22[2] may run contrary to the objective of Article 24[1] which is to secure this anticipation by fixing the applicable law on the day of the instrument. If the deceased opts for his national law on the day of his death, there is a risk that this wish will not be fulfilled.
What form?
The choice of law will need to comply with the formal requirements set out in Article 22[2]. It may be contained in a will or in a disposition of property upon death dating from before or after the establishment of the will.
Note :
The fact that the choice of law can be made after establishing the will is of no consequence insofar as the disputed instrument will only produce its effects on the death of the deceased.
Warning :
The scope of such a choice of law must be taken into full account: failing any wish to the contrary expressed by the testator, it will concern only the will: consequently, the succession will be governed by the law of the last habitual residence of the deceased on the date of their death (Article 21[3]). Once again, practitioners will be required to apply two laws concurrently.
The same will apply in the presence of a person with dual nationality who opts for one of those nationalities for the will and the other for their succession.
Finally, the question of the scope of this choice (only for the will or also for the succession?) is certain to be a source of disputes in the future. Practitioners should therefore be invited to draft choice-of-law clauses in wills with great care and to circumscribe their scope.