Choice of law

In accordance with Article 25(3)[1] it should be possible for the choice of law to be made in favour of the national law of the person making the disposition on the day of the instrument or on the day of their death.

This choice of law may be expressed in the agreement. It remains to be seen whether it can be contained in an instrument at an earlier or later date. In our opinion, it all depends on the form that is used. Admittedly, Article 22[2] requires the choice to be indicated in a disposition of property upon death, which encompasses both wills and agreements as to succession.

But, given that an agreement as to succession is an agreement, any choice of law that might be made after the conclusion of the agreement should also take the form of an agreement, failing which the choice of law might serve as a way for the parties to go back on their commitments unilaterally and would be likely to disregard the legitimate expectations of the parties at the time when the agreement was concluded.

As for a choice of law made at an earlier date, once again the choice of law cannot result from a unilateral instrument, unless it is confirmed in the agreement.

Example

An Italian residing in Germany obtains an agreement from one of his children to waive all his rights to the succession. Pursuant to Article 25[1], the agreement is subject to German law and must therefore be considered valid. If the deceased made a choice of law at a later date by a will, pursuant toArticle 25(3)[1], opting for his national law, the agreement would be null and void! This solution is unacceptable.

Apart from this, the choice of law when there an agreement has been established as to the succession of a person, calls for the same remarks as those that apply to wills.